![]() For more information on offer details, eligibility, restrictions, and our privacy policy, visit Information you submit is collected, stored, processed, and used on servers in the USA. The Offer sponsor is Intel Corporation, 2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA. The Offer may be changed, cancelled, or suspended at any time, for any reason, without notice, at Intel’s reasonable discretion if the fairness or integrity of the Promotion is affected whether due to human or technical error. Certain titles may not be available to all consumers because of age restrictions. We reserve the right to replace titles in the offer for ones of equal or greater value. To participate you must purchase a qualifying Intel® device from a participating retailer no later than Apor as otherwise indicated by the participating retailer, create an Intel® single sign on account (which requires a phone number for account verification and access), enter a valid Master Key no later than July 31, 2023, and respond to a brief survey at. The “Ode to a Mockingbird” accepts the implication of the drug analogy, makes it wonderfully real.Offer valid only while supplies last. (…) Should we be outraged, on behalf of Keats, by such a comparison? I don’t think Keats himself would have done it, let alone Coleridge. The poet was not a nightingale, but he was a vertebrate, and most drugs that have some effect on human beings have a comparable effect on other vertebrates. To complete the circuit, it is perhaps not so surprising that the song of the nightingale could have acted like a drug on John Keats’s nervous system. Songbirds learn to sing this way by comparing test “stanzas” with a “template” imprinted in their brain, a pre-programmed notion of what their species’ song “should” sound like. That is to say, they test their auditory drug on themselvesawakening certain springs, in order to refine the song to the maximum. ![]() Richard Dawkins suggests that nightingales, seeking to perfect the effects that their song causes in the nervous system of other conspecifics, practice with themselves to test what effects certain “stanzas” generate in their nervous system. The sounds emitted by a male canary have an effect on the female that is indistinguishable from that produced by an experimenter with a hypodermic syringe. There is experimental evidence, from the measurement of the hormonal levels of female pigeons and canaries in relation to their behavior, that the sexual state of females is directly influenced by the vocalizations of males, and the effects are integrated in question of days. The song of the nightingale would thus modify the internal physiological state of the female, just as a pharmacological medicine cabinet would. However, the song of the nightingale could be doing more than just informing: could be manipulating the female. Some ornithologists suggest that the song conveys information about the species to which the mockingbird in question belongs, as well as other important information for the female, such as her reproductive condition and so on. Mockingbird males must influence the behavior of females and other males. Let’s analyze to what end did natural selection shape the song of a nightingale. ![]() That would undoubtedly explain why the poet john keats (a great icon in the impressive sci-fi saga Hyperion) was inspired to write Ode to a Mockingbird. ![]() The idea that it works like a drug, then, is not as far-fetched as it seems. But to the neurological effects that the sound emitted by a nightingale can produce. Is the song of a nightingale a drug? No, I don’t mean The Little Nightingale (that’s certainly a hard drug). Fastest AI supercomputer- Tech News | Latest Technology #short
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |